1956 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,013 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1810 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Renault Juva | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Renault | Land Rover |
Model | Juva | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 2590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2158 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2745 mm |