1956 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 1127 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Volvo X670 has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volvo X670 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Renault Juva | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Juva | X670 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1872 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2815 mm |
