1956 Riley RM A vs. 1969 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1969 Subaru FF-1 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 540 kg more than 1969 Subaru FF-1.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Subaru FF-1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 1969 Subaru FF-1 | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | FF-1 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |