1956 Riley RM A vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse weights approximately 170 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse has automatic transmission and 1956 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1956 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
Make | Riley | Mitsubishi |
Model | RM A | Eclipse |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2570 mm |