1956 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,194 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 85 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 2005 Saturn L | |
Make | Riley | Saturn |
Model | RM A | L |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |