1956 Riley RM A vs. 2010 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 737 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 2010 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 2010 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Riley | SsangYong |
Model | RM A | Rexton |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2830 mm |