1956 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 165 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Riley | Seat |
Model | RM A | Exeo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2642 mm |