1956 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sienna is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 720 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Sienna has automatic transmission and 1956 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1956 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Sienna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Riley RM A | 2012 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1765 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3030 mm |
