1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 1999 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 1999 Skoda Octavia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 1999 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Skoda |
Model | Phantom | Octavia |
Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2520 mm |