1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
| Model | Phantom | Navara |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 3210 mm |
