1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith vs. 2009 Ford Galaxy
To start off, 2009 Ford Galaxy is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Ford Galaxy.
Because 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith | 2009 Ford Galaxy | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Silver Wraith | Galaxy |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4887 cc | 2293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2840 mm |
