1956 Rover P4 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1956 Rover P4. (108 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1956 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Rover P4. (206 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Rover P4 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | P4 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 45 L |
