1956 Saab 92B vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 642 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Saab 92B | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Saab | Volvo |
Model | 92B | S60 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 763 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1427 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2800 mm |