1956 Saab 92B vs. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 465 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Saab 92B | 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | Saab | SSC |
| Model | 92B | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 763 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1090 mm |
