1956 Saab 92B vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Saab 92B | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Saab | Lotus |
| Model | 92B | Evora |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 763 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4341 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1222 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2576 mm |
