1956 Saab 92B vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1083 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Saab 92B. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Saab 92B | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Saab | Cadillac |
Model | 92B | CTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 763 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |