1956 Simca Aronde vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Simca Aronde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Simca Aronde (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Simca Aronde should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Simca Aronde (90 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm). This means 1956 Simca Aronde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Simca Aronde | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Simca | Subaru |
Model | Aronde | R2 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 63 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 66.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2370 mm |