1956 Simca Aronde vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Simca Aronde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Simca Aronde | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Simca | Land Rover |
| Model | Aronde | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2891 mm |
