1956 Simca Oceane vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Ford Windstar is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Oceane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Oceane would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1956 Simca Oceane. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Oceane.
Because 1956 Simca Oceane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Oceane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Simca Oceane | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Simca | Ford |
| Model | Oceane | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3066 mm |
