1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Studebaker | Sunbeam |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 4247 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2190 mm |
