1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600
To start off, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 | |
Make | Studebaker | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Sky Hawk | 2600 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 2583 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2510 mm |