1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 545 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Studebaker | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sky Hawk | Colt |
Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4735 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2390 mm |