1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 125 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Studebaker | Kia |
Model | Sky Hawk | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4735 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2845 mm |