1956 Suzuki Light vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (266 HP) has 252 more horse power than 1956 Suzuki Light. (14 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1956 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1400 kg more than 1956 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (450 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Suzuki Light | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
| Model | Light | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 4701 cc |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
