1956 Suzuki Light vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1956 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1956 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1956 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Suzuki Light | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Light | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 3400 cc |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3270 mm |
