1956 Talbot T 26 vs. 2008 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2008 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1956 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1956 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2008 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2008 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1956 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1956 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Talbot T 26 | 2008 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Talbot | Toyota |
| Model | T 26 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 4482 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 236 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm |
