1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 1990 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1990 Ford Falcon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Falcon (120 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Falcon weights approximately 210 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 1990 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Master RR | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3157 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2800 mm |
