1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 1999 Acura RL
To start off, 1999 Acura RL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura RL (205 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura RL weights approximately 465 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Toyota Master RR | 1999 Acura RL | |
Make | Toyota | Acura |
Model | Master RR | RL |
Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3472 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 205 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2920 mm |