1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 308 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Master RR | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3984 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 220 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2800 mm |
