1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2001 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2001 Toyota MR2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota MR2 (140 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Toyota Master RR | 2001 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Master RR | MR2 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1799 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 140 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |