1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP) has 292 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1343 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Master RR | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 6000 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 332 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 2553 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2946 mm |