1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2010 Nissan 370Z is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan 370Z (332 HP) has 292 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan 370Z weights approximately 368 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Nissan 370Z | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Master RR | 370Z |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 332 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4247 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1326 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
