1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo V70 (235 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo V70 weights approximately 388 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Master RR | V70 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3192 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2820 mm |
