1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 683 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Master RR | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2774 mm |
