1956 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS (305 HP) has 265 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 525 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Master RR | CLS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3498 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 305 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2875 mm |
