1956 Toyota Super vs. 2011 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2011 Renault Scenic is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Scenic (129 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Super.
Because 1956 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Super | 2011 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Toyota | Renault |
| Model | Super | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1870 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
