1956 Toyota Super vs. 2013 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2013 Nissan Rogue is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Super would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Rogue (168 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Super.
Because 1956 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Toyota Super | 2013 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Super | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
