1956 Triumph 10 Break vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1206 kg more than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Triumph 10 Break | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | 10 Break | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1966 kg |
