1956 Triumph 10 Break vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 3 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Triumph 10 Break | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | 10 Break | 3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1300 kg |
