1956 Vauxhall Wyvern vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 828 kg more than 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern has manual transmission. 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Vauxhall Wyvern | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Vauxhall | Cadillac |
Model | Wyvern | CTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1505 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |