1956 Volvo 120 vs. 2010 Lexus HS
To start off, 2010 Lexus HS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Lexus HS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus HS (187 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1956 Volvo 120. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus HS should accelerate faster than 1956 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus HS weights approximately 675 kg more than 1956 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus HS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Volvo 120 | 2010 Lexus HS | |
Make | Volvo | Lexus |
Model | 120 | HS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1582 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4694 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1506 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |