1957 AC Ace vs. 2000 AC Cobra
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1957 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Cobra weights approximately 10 kg more than 1957 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Ace | 2000 AC Cobra | |
| Make | AC | AC |
| Model | Ace | Cobra |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3506 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |
