1957 AC Ace vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (88 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Micra weights approximately 96 kg more than 1957 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Micra (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Ace | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Ace | Micra |
Year Released | 1957 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 46 L |