1957 AC Ace vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Ace | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Ace | 3 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |