1957 AC Ace vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 AC Ace (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1957 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 AC Ace (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1957 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Ace | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Ace | 6 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |