1957 AC Aceca vs. 1952 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 1957 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,139 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Humber Super Snipe (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 863 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 1952 Humber Super Snipe | |
| Make | AC | Humber |
| Model | Aceca | Super Snipe |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4139 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1753 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |
