1957 AC Aceca vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1957 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. Both 1957 AC Aceca and 1952 Triumph TR2 are equipped with a 1,991 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Triumph TR2 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Triumph TR2 should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 AC Aceca weights approximately 25 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Aceca | TR2 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 56 L |