1957 AC Aceca vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1961 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 981 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1957 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |