1957 AC Aceca vs. 1968 AMC AMX
To start off, 1968 AMC AMX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 AMC AMX weights approximately 487 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 1968 AMC AMX | |
| Make | AC | AMC |
| Model | Aceca | AMX |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 315 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1377 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2470 mm |
