1957 AC Aceca vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Toyota Celica (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Celica weights approximately 275 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | Celica |
Year Released | 1957 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2620 mm |